Thursday, January 17, 2008

930,180 minutes: RENT on Broadway closes June 2008 (NY Times Article)

News posted recently on the NY Times. Hay. Hintayin na lang bumalik. The memorable ones always do (and still reap awards). I wonder if they'll ever restage it in the Philippines and unleash great talents again, like what happened with Bituin Escalante.

From: http://www.nytimes. com/2008/ 01/16/theater/16broad.html?_r=1&ref=theater&oref=slogin


Published: January 16, 2008

Nine hundred thirty thousand, one hundred eighty minutes.

That’s how you measure the total running time “Rent” will have played on Broadway when, as the producers said on Tuesday, it closes after its evening performance on June 1, making it the seventh-longest- running Broadway show in history.

But the length of its run is not nearly as significant as the kind of show it was. An East Village rock version of Puccini’s opera “La Bohème,” “Rent” brought a youthful energy — and young theatergoers — to Broadway, to a degree not seen since “Hair.” It also brought with it a real-life story so affecting that it would have overwhelmed the musical itself had the substance of the musical not been so intertwined with the story of its creation.

On the night of the final dress rehearsal at the New York Theater Workshop, the nonprofit theater in the East Village where the musical began, Jonathan Larson, the 35-year-old composer and librettist, died of an aortic aneurysm. He had been working for seven years on the musical, which includes portraits of his friends and the artists and addicts in his neighborhood, young people on the edge of poverty and in the shadow of AIDS, battling the coming wave of gentrification in the name of “La Vie Bohème.”

The show opened in February 1996, two and half weeks after Mr. Larson’s death. Critics were ecstatic, Broadway landlords were battling to play host to an uptown transfer, and everyone in town, including celebrities like Steven Spielberg and Anna Wintour, was scrambling to get tickets to a 150-seat Off Broadway theater in the East Village. Already a theater phenomenon, “Rent,” directed by Michael Greif, exploded onto Broadway two months later, on April 16, 1996, turning members of its mostly obscure cast into stars. It went on to win four Tony Awards, including best musical, and the Pulitzer Prize.

The original cast, which included the now familiar names Taye Diggs, Idina Menzel, Daphne Rubin-Vega, Jesse L. Martin, Adam Pascal and Anthony Rapp, suddenly appeared everywhere, including the cover of Newsweek, marking the first time since “A Chorus Line” that a Broadway musical was on the cover of a national newsmagazine.

“One day you can’t afford to get Chinese-food takeout, and suddenly you’re getting free meals at Balthazar,” said Ms. Rubin-Vega, who added that the public obsession with the show, and the story behind it, seemed disquietingly macabre at the time.

The show’s Broadway home is the Nederlander Theater, which had long been dark before “Rent” moved in, but which was transformed into a bohemian playground of leopard-print carpets and graffitied walls. All along West 41st Street, so-called Rentheads, legions of young fanatics watching the show for the millionth time, can be seen lining up on 41st Street, sometimes overnight, for $20 day-of-show tickets.

“Rent,” which cost $240,000 to put up downtown, has gone on to gross more than $280 million on Broadway and another $330 million on the road. Productions have been mounted on six continents. A movie version of the show, which starred almost all of the original cast, opened in 2005, although it was a box-office failure.

Dependent as “Rent” is on a young audience and fueled by the occasional celebrity casting announcement, its grosses could be erratic. But recently the show’s take at the box office was consistently less than its costs. A closing date was on the horizon, and after some not entirely amicable back-and-forth, the Broadway producers, Jeffrey Seller, Kevin McCollum and Allan S. Gordon, agreed to a guarantee to keep the show running through June 1.

“Something happened with us in the fall in which we were consistently selling less tickets than we were last year and three or four years ago,” Mr. Seller said, citing new competition on Broadway like “Legally Blonde” and “Spring Awakening.” On the other hand, he said, when the show began, “I couldn’t have foreseen that we’d get to five years.”

Over the past 12 years, the Larson family has viewed the show as a source of pride as well as, in the words of Mr. Larson’s father, Al, “a constant reminder of something we don’t really want to be reminded about.”

In an interview from his home in Los Angeles, Mr. Larson said the ending of the show’s Broadway run would mean more shows in high schools and small theaters, a development he embraces. But, he said, “for essentially 12 years I’ve been saying I’d trade the whole business in if Jonny could still be alive. I still feel that way.”


Tuesday, January 15, 2008

TP's Kudeta


After a tiring albeit successful week-long chemistry conference at this past week, I was able to take a break and catch the opening night of Tanghalang Pilipino’s Kudeta at the CCP last Friday with some friends.

After seeing Insiang two months ago, I was excited to be back at the CCP for the new production. The teaser blurb (specifically “wickedly funny”) caught my attention a long time ago:

A wickedly funny play about a coup that topples the country’s President and how he fights back with all the weapons he has in his disposal- his enemies’ uncanny ability to self-destruct, and descendants who come out of nowhere. Is this the Philippines?

I had only read this blurb shortly when I watched the ADMU TA Seniors’ Fluid directed by Floy Quintos. Knowing he’d be handling this production only made me look forward to it more. The play is George de Jesus III’s Filipino adaptation of The Coup by Mustapha Matura. Matura, born in Trinidad, is a highly-awarded playwright, having quite a number of plays staged in both the US and UK.

The action is set in Trinidad and Tobago and the scene opens with Caribbean commonfolk gathering around the grave of ex-president Edward Jones. We learn that Jones dies as a result of a coup, though the details are not mentioned. Amidst intermittent gunfire, the townsfolk amuse us with juicy gossip about the president and end with frenzied dancing and praise of their deceased leader (they had a “Caribbean choreographer” listed in the programme). The next scene, possibly set weeks before the initial scene, opens with Edward Jones, played by Philippine film and theater luminary Mario O‘Hara, in a prison cell guarded by soldier named Mikey. We eventually learn hat Jones is already held as prisoner by the coup plotters. Jones is visited by these coup leaders every now and then and is threatened to sign manifestos that would help them legitimize their new government. Amidst their threats, however, Jones refuses to cooperate and uses the insecurities and suspicions of the bungling coup leaders to turn them against one other.

With the heavy topic, one may find it interesting that Mustapha manages to fuse in comedic moments smoothly: the leader’s megalomania and admitted promiscuity, the First Family’s excessive lifestyle, the converted torture expert, the befriended prisonguard (who may actually be the president’s illegitimate son), and the antics of soldiers trying to secure their newfound power. Behind these events, though is a dark truth that Floy Quintos admits in his notes, “It could very well be a comedy. But given our own experience with coups and coup plotters, it could be something else. A bleak glimpse into what could happen, into what is entirely possible in this country.”

The play made me wonder what would have happened if Trillanes succeeded in his attempts to overthrow the government. Or even before that- if Honasan succeeded in his? How unpredictable could those situations have been? How lasting the effects?

Two moments from the play strike me the most. The first is when Jones reflects on the path of Trinidad towards independence and later muses, “Hindi pa tayo handa.” Even the preparedness and seriousness of the plotters are questioned later on with their antics: throwing tantrums because they are not saluted, giggling with excitement with small recognitions of leadership, worrying about change when they wind up just like the deposed president in the end. I wonder how Trillanes and company would have carried out the change they wanted if they had succeeded. Perhaps like the end of the play, the suspicions will never end. The new leaders will always have to watch their backs.

The second memorable moment offers an answer to the problem of power. Black Lightning, the military torturer who is later converted offers a soliloquy before he is executed. What does one do with too much power? Black Lighning’s final words: “Let go.”

The play is a must-see, if just for the fine acting of Mario O’Hara. His portrayal of Eddie Jones is powerful, eliciting both laughter and empathy from the audience at the perfect moments. His presence onstage really draws one to the depth or the comedy of a scene: the greatest male performance I’ve seen for quite some time. (I wish I had a pic taken with him after. Sayang!) Notable too are the performances of Bong Cabrera as Mikey and Chrome Cosio as Black Lightning, whom I look forward to seeing take on more lead roles in future shows.

Though the length of the production was a bit taxing (2.5 hours), I enjoyed the show. Not the comeplely comedic play I was expecting, but a more intense comedy: darker and richer, and I’m not complaining.

Kudeta runs at the CCP Tanghalang Huseng Batute until Feb.3 (Fri and Sat at 8pm, Sun at 3pm). Tickets available at Ticketworld (very cheap) so NOOD NA!! Then let me know what you think.

image from: www.tanghalangpilipino.com


Thursday, January 3, 2008

May Himala! (on DVD!!!)

Nagdilang-anghel yata ako sa isa kong blog entry at natupad ang isa kong hiling!

Sa wakas, inilabas na ng ABS-CBN/STAR CINEMA ang HIMALA on DVD. Sana sumunod na ang iba pang mahuhusay na pelikula ng 80's.


P299 lang kaya bili na! Kailan na kaya ang launchdate ng Insiang ng Cinefilipino?


2007 in Theater

This past year has been a fun and busy one of theater-hopping. This has been the most I’ve seen for quite some time, just over the period of a year. There are a few prods I’d rather forget, but there are some treasures in the list I’ll be remembering for a long time too. I have a feeling dadami pa ito ngayong 2008, but it’s not like I’ll be complaining! Here’s to a great year in entertainment and a new one to look forward to.

PRODUCTIONS I’VE SEEN
Sandaang Panaginip (ENTABLADO)
High School Musical (BLUE REP)
Gay Birds (REP PHIL)
The Wedding Singer (REP WORKSHOP)
The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee (BLUE REP)
Fluid (ADMU BFA-TA SENIORS) → best school-based prod I’ve seen this year
Mulan (TP)
Sister Act: Back in the Habit (BLUE REP)
Avenue Q (ATLANTIS)
Himala, the Musicale (TP) → still my fave orig Fil. musical along with ZZZ
Paa ng Kuwago/Sino Ba Kayo? (DULAANG SIBOL)
Into the Woods (NVC)
Insiang (TP) → best original Filipino play I’ve seen ever
The Silent Soprano (DUP)
Fiddler on the Roof (REP PHIL)
The Death of Memory (TA)


PRODUCTIONS I REGRET MISSING (AND MY EXCUSES)
Belong Puti (PETA) → naubusan ng ticket sa gustong date
Batang Rizal (PETA) → board exams
Pilipinas Circa 1907 (TP) → board exams
Children’s Letters to God (AAI) → ang layo ng alabang!
Romulus D’ Grayt (PETA) → kinema event
Art (AAI) → isang gabi lang kasi
Dogeaters (ATLANTIS) → nagtitipid, at napagod dahil 5 prods in nov! haha

2008 PRODUCTIONS I’M LOOKING FORWARD TO SEEING
Kudeta (TP)
EJ (TP)
Skin Deep (PETA)
Altar Boyz (REP PHIL)
Tanikalang Ginto (ENTA)
Golden Child (TP)
Orosman at Zafira (DUP)
Himala (kung ibalik) and Oro Plata Mata (kung matuloy na) (TP)
Hairspray (ATLANTIS)

Saturday, December 8, 2007

TP's Insiang: Daya at Laya


Images from www.tanghalangpilipino.com (Go and check out their site now! Nood na!)



I saw Tanghalang Pilipino’s rerun of Mario O’ Hara’s Insiang at the CCP last November 25 with some friends. Thanks to the subscription (Totally worth it!), we had good seats in the small Huseng Batute Theater.

I’ve waited a long time to see Insiang, having not caught its run in 2002. As I couldn’t use my pass for the initial October run, I had to wait another month. I was already excited by the buzz created by Bright-Eyed Boys, by numerous blogs, especially Gibbs Cadiz’s, and by celebrities and media folk who’ve raved about the production

The programme and the official website (http://www.brighteyedboys.com/insiang) summarize it:

The virginal Insiang boldly holds on to her dreams as she makes her way through the comic, complicated and reckless surroundings of the slums. Still reeling from the untimely death of her father, the young girl seeks affirmation from her mother who continues to be embittered by their situation. She discovers that love and comfort are short lived in the arms of her boyfriend and stepfather. A dangerous flower blossoms in the midst of the squalor as utter desperation sets in. Friends and neighbors can only watch helplessly as the jolting finale unfolds. The wrap-around set and the environmental staging puts audiences in the middle of this unsettling tale about the ruthlessness of power and the failure of forgiveness.

It was only when we entered the theater that I understood what the synopsis meant by “environmental staging.” To say that the wrap-around set was realistic is an understatement. Huseng Batute is small to begin with, but because of its size, it offers flexibility in staging and a sense of intimacy important in telling tales like Insiang’s. Consuming two sides of the small box-theater are urban shanties two storeys high, with Insiang’s as the only one fully exposed to the audience. Wooden scaffoldings rise directly above the audience so that looking up, one sees patches of rusting yero. Criscrossing just below those are black electric wires, tangled as in the real world. Further down are clotheslines with blankets and dusters hanging about.

The shanties look genuine, with trash stocked here and there and laundry hanging everywhere. The raised stage wraps around the audience along two sides and ends as a central ramp: the tubigan/labahan where tsismis is spread and lives are bared. Even behind the audience (along the back walls) there are sari-sari store posters and clothes hung about. If you wanted to, you can reach out and touch the set or even the players. In fact, the audience was so near the action, some unfortunate members got sprayed with “blood” in one of the violent scenes. You’d almost think as though you were really in the slums of Pasay save the air-conditioned setting and theatrical lighting.

The set makes you feel immediately part of the action and, indeed, that is needed as gossip seems to be one of key facets of the play. In this small community, everyone knows everything about each one’s lives. The questions that follow are: with all the tsismis going about, which are true and which must be believed? Toyang is at once introduced as the narrator figure and serves as our guide in telling the story of Insiang. Her addition creates a smoother flow for the story and helps introduce flashbacks well. As with most narrator figures, she has the power to stop occurrences, play them back again, and talk to the audience directly. Aside from this crucial task, she provides comic relief- sometimes juxtaposed with some of the most violent scenes you’ll see onstage, leaving one in the purgatory of laughter and shock.

Sheenly Vee Gener and Mailes Kanapi are wonders as actresses! I’ve never seen more powerful live performances than theirs. The gradual transformation of Sheenly from virginal Insiang to dangerous flower is flawless. Ricky Davao was menacing as Dado: a believable yet frightening “villain.” Peewee O’Hara was endearing as Toyang, bringing the right amount of comedy when the play called for it. The rest of the ensemble are also something to look forward to in future productions of TP. The show only reminded me why I love the company’s productions so much.


Insiang for me is a story of power and oppression. I remember vaguely Fr. Albert Alejo, S.J.’s article, Laya at Daya. Forget the power plays in Malacanang or Makati. The real power struggles happen down to the level of the masa. Oppression is not just a problem caused by those above. It is a vicious truth even to those below. Ika nga ni Dr. Gus Rodriguez ng Philosophy Department, “Being simple is different from being just. You can live simple lives and still be unjust.”

Napag-iisip ka kung kaya ba talagang mawala ang siklo ng Daya. Lahat tayo, dumaranas ng Daya sa iba’t ibang paraan. Ang masaklap, minsan naiisip natin na sa pagiging mandaraya sa halip na nadadaya, mas nakalalamang tayo at mas bubuti na ang buhay. Naghahanap tayo ng paraang mabawi ang nadaya sa atin at patuloy lang ang siklo.




Insiang, the innocent and oppressed, eventually learns to be the oppressor and still we cannot help but feel for her, even with her wicked deed at the end. We start to think if her setting could have allowed for any other course of action. Was there really no escape from this cycle of injustice?

Toyang frames the disturbing story as though it were a Pinoy telenovela. Amusingly, she gives technical descriptions of what happens next and later concludes that this is real life and not a telenovela. There is real-life drama happening in these communities; there is a real power-struggle. Even just from the sharing of experiences of Ateneans coming from their different immersion programs, we learn of different forms of injustice. Kung ang mga magsasaka na lang ng Sumilao, hindi pinakikinggan ng mga nasa itaas at hindi man lang pinakialaman ng marami nang magsimula sila, paano pa kaya ang mga kwento ng daya na sa maliliit na komunidad nangyayari? For all we know, we already have a multitude of Insiangs, jaded, shattered, and dead inside.

Of course, we know there is hope for change if we end the cycle of daya with ourselves and live as just as we can. It may take courage to cry out in the face of injustice and start the change, but it is achievable. We need not look far in looking for models for change: Gawad Kalinga, Simbahang Lingkod ng Diyos, JVP, and others working for change. In our hearts, we hold that freedom is at hand.

------------
Last three shows of Insiang today 8 December, 2007 at 3pm and 8pm and tomorrow, 9 December at 3pm. CCP Tanghalang Pilipino 8233661. NOOD NA!!!

Great production images seen at Jojit Lorenzo's Multiply Site: http://jojitlorenzo.multiply.com/photos/album/61/Insiang_performance



cross-posted: davidplatz.blogspot.com

Friday, December 7, 2007

His Dark Materials: What do you mean anti-God?




After reading the entire series, I was not offended as a Catholic. Perhaps it is true that if you read the series and your faith is shattered, then it may not have been strong enough to begin with. At the very least, it makes one question if he has really tried to understand what he believes in. (Theology as Faith seeking understanding, anyone?) If one is moved to learn more about his beliefs to have things clarified, then great! We shouldn't be drones and blindly accept what is thrown at us anyway.

It's interesting to note sometimes how the Magisterium of Lyra's world has corrupted different Church dogma found in "our world" too. We see scenarios speculating what could have happened if the Church hierarchy focused on building power alone, if the inquisition continued, and if dogmatic control was the only thing on its mind. We then start to think and be glad it's not the same in our world. (Or shudder at the thought if we are going there). Also, I believe one must not take the book as a religious treatise, but as a simple work of fiction. Pullman expresses his beliefs through some of the characters, but at the end, will not force you to share his own.

There is one statement I'd like to address, though, and it pertains to all organized religion:

Pullman writes, “But when you look at organised religion of whatever sort – whether it's Christianity in all its variants, or whether it's Islam or some forms of extreme Hinduism – wherever you see organised religion and priesthoods and power, you see cruelty and tyranny and repression. It's almost a universal law."

I don't believe that it's a "universal law." Perhaps he wrote this passage just as an extreme way of showing even organized religion can still go wrong at times and it is in such times that it must be wary of its power. It's not all cruelty, tyranny, and repression that we see in religion. There is a wealth of experiences immersed in love, sacrifice, and hope too.

The series' critics have a lot to say about the atheistic and anti-God sentiments of some characters. First, let it be clear that the Authority they speak of is different from the God we may believe in. His folklore may be based on some Gnostic beliefs that the God people know is different from the Creator. In the story, the Authority was just an early angel who seized control over all. Eventually, even this Authority grew older and simply delved into mysteries while his Reagent, the Metatron took over. It is this Metatron who was portrayed as ruthless and power-hungry. The novels are anti-authoritarian, against institutions that are drunk with power and stifle creative thought and free will.

Some of the best lines I've read regarding belief in God came from the third book in the series: The Amber Spyglass. Near the end, Lyra and Will question Mary Malone, a nun turned particle physicist and a self-proclaimed atheist, about her past and her faith.

"When you stopped believing in God," he (Will) went on, "did you stop believing in good and evil?"

"No. But I stopped believing there was a power of good and a power of evil that were outside us. And I came to believe that good and evil are names for what people do, not for what they are. All that we can say is that this is a good deed, because it helps someone, or that's an evil one, because it hurts them. Peopre are too complicated to have simple labels."

"Yes," said Lyra firmly.

"Did you miss God?" asked Will.

"Yes," Mary said, "terribly. And I still do. And what I miss most is the sense of being connected to the whole of the universe. I used to feel I was connected to God like that, and that because he was there, I was connected to the whole of his creation..."

She reflects again a few moments later.

This was the very thing she'd told Will about when he asked if she missed God: it was the sense that the whole universe was alive, and that everything was connected to everything with threads of meaning. When she'd been a Christian, she had felt connected, too; but when she left the Church, she felt loose and free and light, in a universe without purpose.

And then had come the discovery of the Shadows and her journey into another world, and now this vivid night, and it was plain that everything else was throbbing with purpose and meaning, but she was cut off from it. And it was impossible to find a connection, because there was no God.

Now how can that be anti-God?

Monday, November 26, 2007

Himala the Musical: on faith and freedom

It was November in 2003 when I first saw Tanghalang Pilipino’s musical adaptation of Himala with a bunch of high school friends. The wish to see it first came more from intrigue than interest as I only saw the name of the production in a CCP calendar I got after watching Ballet Philippines’ Darna that year. Before that night, I had never seen the acclaimed film, nor read its screenplay. All I knew, as was probably the case with other Filipinos unfamiliar with the film, was that Nora Aunor starred in it, it was an important film in its time, and that it gave birth to the immortal line, “Walang himala!“













(Image of the 2nd staging og Himala from www.tanghalangpilipino.com . Visit their site to check for shows, get additional info, or buy tickets. Nood na!)



I still remember that night as though it were yesterday. The production was held in CCP’s Tanghalang Huseng Batute, (the experimental studio theater). Upon entering the theater, I was hooked by the set immediately. Taking up almost three-fourths of the entire theater was the stage: a tilted platform. Scrawled on the angled stage in chalk were prayers that seemed to be in different dialects. These led one’s eyes to the farthest corner of the stage in which was set an enormous dead tree atop a small hill. Extending from these corners were the two other walls of the set, reminiscent of wooden walls with platforms jutting out every so often. We would later realize that these wooden panels opened automatically to serve as windows or doors to the different houses of barrio Cupang. Barrenness was an instant theme, with the dead tree and the desert-tan hill and walls. At the very top of the walls was an intriguing and unsettling site. It seemed as though the walls ended with soil, grass, and crosses jutting out of the “ground.” Looking at it from top to bottom, it seemed as if the entire town were set in a deep grave- miserable and inescapable. I knew then that this show was to be something special.

I knew of Vince de Jesus’ music through a song in the Hangad Acapella album— “Sabay sa ihip ng hangin”, a lovesong-prayer to God. It came as a surprise later that the song was included in the score in one of the most intense moments of the musical. I admit, there were some times when I couldn’t get the musical sense of some of the songs. The only thing I could remember was that appreciating it was like a first listen to an unfamiliar Sondheim score— with moments of “What happened there? What note was that again? Wow, that’s difficult to sing.” followed by sudden breaks of truly melodic lines that hit the point and hit one’s heart. By the end, I was in praise of the production.

For me, the musical style complemented the show’s major themes and flow. There would be moments of uncertainty— of tones seemingly in discord and dissonance, suddenly followed by lines hauntingly clear and melodic. Cupang would be in distress and sickness followed by comfort and healing through Elsa. With Elsa’s healing bringing fame to the town, it would afterwards experience a different kind of confusion: that brought about by a tourist frenzy and a blind belief in Elsa, only to be silenced and wiped away in time. Even Elsa would have her moments of doubt and confusion, followed by a terrible loss, and finally a clarity of mind leading to her final confession.

The actors and actresses then were stellar both vocally and acting-wise, especially May Bayot as Elsa, Dulce as her mother, Cyntha Culig-Guico as Chayong, her close religious friend, and Isay Alvarez as Nimia, the returning town whore and Elsa’s estranged friend.

The icing on the cake was a special guest present in the audience that evening. Yes, the original Elsa was only a few seats away from us that night. Nora Aunor was there and seemed to truly enjoy the production. (I wonder if she still thought she could have done as good a job as May Bayot?)

I left the theater that night reaffirmed that Philippine Theater is indeed beautiful, alive, and ever-improving. Gino Gonzales immediately became my favorite production designer, Tanghalang Pilipino topped my list of Philippine companies, and, Vince de Jesus (of current Zsa Zsa Zaturnnah ze Muzikal and ABS-CBN fame) became someone to look forward to in future productions.

That night was so memorable that when Himala was restaged in a larger venue a second time during the National Theater Festival in 2004, I was back with the same friends to see it a second time.

Last November 8- almost exactly four years after I first saw the production, I was back at the CCP to see a special preview of the new run— one that was to be presented in the Contemporary Theater Festival in Shanghai this year. Talk about super-fans seeing a production a third time!

As with all things, the production turned out to be the same and not the same. The same because it contained the original songs and retained most of the original cast. Not the same because of the new simplistic set, the reordering of some songs, and the streamlined storyline. It still was heavy and moving material and I still loved it, but it was though an important cast member was lost with the absence of that enormous set. The streamlined plot led to a faster-paced musical, which I’m sure would be appreciated by more people. All in all, some changes here and there couldn’t take anything away from this superb piece.

The experience was different too with some insights that were probably more distilled after seeing it for a third time. For instance, the very incident of the vision or himala led to more questions and speculations. Throughout the play, we would hear of stereotype descriptions of the three friends: Elsa as smart (matalino), Chayong as prayerful (madasalin), and Nimia as brave (matapang). We would see the latter two’s sterotypes clearly present in their decisions and actions. Elsa, however lacked that concrete “matalino” mindset. Could it be then that the vision was indeed all a ruse by this smart Elsa to bring her people together and inject a little hope in the religious community? Did she find ways to heal her townsfolk through means fully explainable by her smarts? As said by Tomas del Rio in an earlier article, was the blinding white light that enveloped Elsa at the start a true vision, or the quintessential lightbulb that signaled a sly new idea forming in her mind?

As the show progressed, the importance of the “reality” of the miracles dwindled as the choices of the people affected by the phenomenon are placed centerstage. How did Elsa’s friends react? How did her mother take her fame? How did Nimia deal with the religious frenzy? Was the town able to escape its desolation and barrenness with this himala? Ricky Lee himself believed that the show was more about the questions it generated than the answers it provided.

The songs hit deeper this time too and made me finally decide that I had two favorite scenes in the musical: both of which were prayers. Both scenes happened after Elsa and Chayong faced a devastating event in their lives. Forced to question their own beliefs and the meaning of their lives, these two scenes formed the core of the musical for me.

The first was Elsa’s prayer. Her words are unforgettable. In deep anguish followed by anger she cries out to a silent Virgin Mary or even a silent God:

Bakit ang tahimik Mo naman?
Madaya Ka! Ako’y kausapin Mo!
Hindi Mo ba nakita na doon sa burol winasak nila ako?

May isang tinig na hindi mo narinig
Sumisigaw dumadaing
Iyon ay tinig ko… iyon ay tinig ko.
Nasaan ka na? Nandito ako ngayon!
Ang Elsa Mo, si Elsa mo!
Kailangan ko ring maghilom… kailangan ko rin maghilom!

Magpakita kang muli! Ako’y linisin Mo.

Immediately following this scene is Elsa’s religious friend Chayong in a less anguished state as she was previously. She walks slowly bearing a candle and sings her prayer sweetly, almost as if offering a love song:

Ihip ng hangin, pakinggan mo’t iyong maririnig
Awit ng pag-ibig, alay ko sa’Yo lamang
Kahit na ilang ulit Mo nang narinig, sana’y pansinin
Ang tinig kong umaawit ng kundiman
Ang puso kong sabik sa ‘Yong kanlungan
Ako sana’y mahalin kahit nagkadungis
Kahit ako’y maligaw, sa ‘Yo ay babalik
Sabay sa ihip ng hangin
Kailan kaya ang susunod na hanging darating?

Kahit na ilang ulit mo nang marinig, sana’y pansinin
Ang tinig kong umaawit ng kundiman
Ang puso kong sabik sa ‘Yong kanlungan
Iyo sanang marinig aking panalangin
Na kahit ako ay maligaw, sa ‘Yo ay babalik
Sabay sa ihip ng hangin.
Tangi kong ligaya ay makapiling Ka!

(Song also in Hangad Acapella)

With the contrast of these two prayers, one is truly disturbed that in the next scene, it is Chayong who takes her own life.

Is it perhaps an active faith then that grapples with the blows and trials sent one’s way that succeeds and finds true meaning. Anger, then, must be acceptable especially if it leads to a deeper understanding of one’s self and one’s faith. In the end, it is the blind belief of barrio Cupang, of Chayong that becomes frail, inexplicable, and eventually damning. To succeed and find meaning, we take part in creating it ourselves. We choose to have faith and not let it be imposed on us simply, as a belief in a curse is imposed blindly on a Cupang. This is why Elsa’s final lines ring true to this day:
Walang Himala! Tayo ang gumagawa ng Himala. Tayo ang gumagawa ng mga sumpa. At tayo ang gumagawa ng mga diyos!

I do not believe that this is an atheistic statement, nor a trashing of the possibility of wonder or even so-called “simple miracles.” What it bashes is the simplistic view of a miracle, the death of choice and will, the blindness of some forms of faith.

We still do need miracles every now and then. But miracles come in many ways and forms and we need not look for grand occurrences or signs. The musical ends on a positive note:

Anong kailangan mong marinig?
Anong kailangan mong makita
Bago ka maniwala?
Hihintayin mo bang umulan ng rosas
Hihintayin mo bang bumaba ang kamay ng Diyos mula sa langit?

O sapat na sa ‘yo ang ngiti ng sanggol?
Sapat na ba ang patak ng ulan?
Sapat na ba ang wagas na pag-ibig
Bilang isang himala?

Ang himala ay nasa puso ng tao.
Ang bawat puso ay pugad ng himala.

It was only after seeing the theatrical version that I got to see the film via CinemaOne during the Lenten season. I understood then why so many Filipinos loved this film. I believe it now to be the greatest original Filipino film since the 80’s.

If Himala the musical comes back for a fourth run expect me there. And please, TP, record the cast album finally that time around and Star Cinema or Unitel, please release the film on DVD already! Treasures like these must be shared. The day that happens will already be a miracle for me.

---------------------------------
Pictures of the current production can be found in Jojit Lorenzo's Multiply Site:
http://jojitlorenzo.multiply.com/photos/album/68


Crossposted: davidplatz.blogspot.com